Duped Dad Takes on OK Law
Posted on | January 19, 2017 | 3 Comments
OK Man Ordered To Pay Child Support Despite Not Being Father
Thomas said he had no reason to question it before he did, but, because he missed the deadline, the judge ordered him to pay around $500 a month in child support, plus, nearly $15,000 in back support plus interest – all for a child that is not his.
Though he knows it won’t help him, Thomas says he plans to fight the law in hopes of keeping other men from suffering the same fate.
Source: NewsOn6
Via: MRCtv
Share:
Comments
3 Responses to “Duped Dad Takes on OK Law”
Leave a Reply
They Said It:
We hold out to the people of other countries an invitation to come and settle among us as members of our rapidly growing family, and for the blessings which we offer them we require of them to look upon our country as their country and to unite with us in the great task of preserving our institutions and thereby perpetuating our liberties.
Search Archives
Latest
Categories
Arizona
- Arizona Watch
- Brainster
- Cowboy Blob
- Coyote Blog
- Desert Cat Musings
- eNews AZ
- Exurban League
- Great Satan Inc
- Infinite Monkeys
- Intellectual Conservative
- Macker's World
- Misanthropic Me
- MoonBattery
- Papa Todd
- Phoenix 411
- Sandcastle Scrolls
- Smallest Minority
- Sonoran Alliance
- The View From My Chair
- The Western Free Press
January 20th, 2017 @ 3:36 pm
This is a pretty interesting case. He is clearly the father (I think it’s dangerous to place too much stock in the biological aspect), but it also relies on the father admitting “guilt”. The law may define father based on the name on a birth certificate, but he could claim that he was simply helping the mother out. If the cost of fraud (assuming the state would even pursue such a case) is less than the cost of child support…
Since he’s clearly trying to not be the father, I wonder if he could move away from Oklahoma. I’m sure there are plenty of states where he wouldn’t be treated as the legal father.
People problems are so frequently challenging and interesting. 🙂
PS: The CAPTCHA is silly. It presents numbers as words but refuses to accept words as answers.
January 21st, 2017 @ 7:53 pm
A relative of mine had to pay child support for a kid conceived when his ex-wife had an affair and didn’t inform him. Somehow, the “war on women” types seem to think this is just fine.
BTW, I got the captcha wrong and the whole comment was lost the first time I typed it in!
January 21st, 2017 @ 7:54 pm
I should have added: the child support requirement came even as paternity tests showed that the kid wasn’t his.