A Failure To Communicate

On 09/10/2011, in Arizona, peeves, shopping, by Vox

I was wandering the aisles of a local dollar store, looking for parts for projects I never have time to finish ;-) Also shopping that day were a woman and her…grandchild? Seemed like a big age difference, but I am guessing.

This is how their visit went:

*crash*
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”

A few more steps, *crunch*
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”

A bit farther, *crinkle*
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”

Over and over, all around the store. Step, step, step – *crinkle, crunch, crash, boom*
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”
“Didn’t I tell you not to touch nuthin?”
“yaa”

I wanted to go up to her and say, “Lady, he clearly knows you said it – perhaps you should explain what it MEANS!



 

Great Pumpkin

On 08/28/2011, in animals, by Vox

We have been incorporating pumpkin puree* in the critters’ food for a while now.

It originally started because the new kitten has odor ‘issues’. I know part of that was just her age (kittens have notoriously smelly poop LOL) and part, I assume, was her early feral life. Hoping that a bit of extra fiber would help her digest, I started adding a spoonful to her food every morning.

It soon became obvious that she viewed it as a treat, as do all the other critters. Our ritual now involves me pulling the can out of the fridge, which gets her excitedly purring and squeaking at my feet as I mix it into her dry food. She then sits up like a Meerkat to lick the spoon. As I carry the bowl to her crate, she runs ahead and climbs on top (the only place she can go that the other cats can’t, the little monkey) so she can have first dibs. Bubblegum settles into the crate below to wait his turn – when she has had her fill, I put the bowl down there for him to snarf on. When he gets done, he leaves and Lizzy jumps up to finish it off.

In the mean time, I give each of the dogs a bit from the spoon. Just for a bit of variety, I made them some frozen treats with yogurt, pumpkin & peanut butter – those are a huge hit with both boys.

I have also heard that, in aiding digestion, pumpkin helps reduce hair balls. That would be a huge hit with me.

So far, the effect on Gypsy has been a much less offensive litter box and less stench in general. I don’t know yet whether it has had any effect on the older cats & their hair balls. I have no ‘solid’ evidence of what it may or may not be doing for the dogs – but I assume a little healthy fiber could only be a good thing. And all of them think I’m spoiling them.

Who’d have guessed a can of orange mush could make so many of us happy :-)

* 100% pure pumpkin only; not pie filling, no sugar or spices added

(Sorry for the odd post, but several folks had asked about it, so figured I would share here)



 

California Dreaming

On 08/25/2011, in celebrities, peeves, politics, by Vox

Once again, a story about ridiculous government over-reach. Where are all the Hollywood Libs, the Greenies like Ed Begley, to protect these folks?

Are we really at a point that we allow the government to drive people out of their homes because they aren’t consuming power generated by the state? Are we really to believe that a man who has lived in the middle of nowhere, a full 10 miles from his closest neighbor, has generated nuisance complaints? Perhaps Quentin Tarantino, who used the man’s church in his Kill Bill movies, could step up and get these people some help.

All they want to do is continue to live on the property they own.



 

All Deaths Are Not Created Equal

On 08/16/2011, in Law, peeves, politics, by Vox

I once again read some simpleton quote the standard, “How can Pro-Lifers be for the death penalty? Is life sacred or not?” screed. So ridiculous, so wrong – and so completely not comparable.

No, I don’t believe the taking of an innocent life by an individual who finds that life “inconvenient” to be on a level field with a society choosing to enact the most severe punishment on an adult who has been found guilty of committing a crime so heinous it requires the harshest sentence.

You want to equate children to criminals, lets make it more fitting.

How can those pro-abortion folks not be in favor of lethal injection for every person arrested for a criminal offense that might result in a prison term? What with over-crowding & budget cuts, any additional prisoners would be terribly inconvenient for us

I find criminals very unwanted. Sure, being arrested doesn’t mean they are guilty; but they certainly aren’t as innocent as those babies are.

UPDATE: How about this – you have to wait to perform an abortion just as long as it generally takes to carry out a typical death sentence, with appeals & such. After 20 or so years, if you still feel that child deserves to die, you get him or her to accompany you to a clinic where a ‘doctor’ will perform one of these so-called “humane” procedures.

***************************************

Some people have messaged me and they somehow missed that I am CLEARLY illustrating an absurd argument by being absurd. I am certainly not calling for lethal injection kits in every police cruiser. I do, in fact, believe in due process, something that (as Phineas points out) those prisoners on death row have had – and those babies have not.

 

Law & Collection Agencies

On 07/19/2011, in Arizona, Law, work, by Vox

As a payroll service, we are often harassed by collection agencies looking for our “employees” I have often wondered about the legality of that, and what our rights are as far as getting them to stop – because it is really freaking annoying.

Lately, we are being harassed regarding former employees. There has to be some way to stop that – they are relentless and obnoxious.

Anyone with insight into the practices of collection agencies that can give me some pointers?

 

Clearly A Victim Of MSNBC

On 07/13/2011, in politics, USA, by Vox

Found this in a comment stream on Google+

Complete regurgitation of inaccurate MSM talking points.

The democrats have given in over and over again to the Republicans, arguably placing the country in the situation it is today, and it’s come to a point that one more concession to the Republicans is enough to destroy the middle class, and redefine the lower class.

I find it appalling that the people, GOP especially, that were elected to represent the people of your country, that were elected to do what was best for your country, and were elected to make your country the great place that it is so often claimed to be are willing to viciously screw 99% of the citizens over for a chance to be in a better position come 2012.

Concessions need to be made on both sides, and a middle ground needs to be established that benefits the most possible people, not just the top 1%.

Hope his answer doesn’t count for too much of his grade – cause it is a big FAIL.

 

Frivolous Expenditures

On 07/07/2011, in politics, USA, by Vox

The budget battle drags on in D.C.
Obama is calling together congressional leaders to work on a compromise.
Spending cuts seem unlikely, tax increases seem assured.

Basic economics (which few people seem to grasp these days) dictate that you shouldn’t buy what you can’t afford.

So, those of you wringing your hands and gnashing your teeth over potential program cuts:

  1. What is it you are afraid to see the government STOP buying?
  2. What program or programs do you believe need to be off limits?

  3. Why do you think those programs are necessary?
  4. Why do you feel they should be funded by taxpayers?

Convince me that your pet cause doesn’t fall under “discretionary spending”.

 
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

  • He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
  • He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
  • He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
  • He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
  • He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
  • He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
  • He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
  • He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
  • He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
  • He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
  • He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
  • He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
  • For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
  • For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
  • For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
  • For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
  • For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
  • For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
  • For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
  • For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
  • For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
  • He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
  • He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
  • He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
  • He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
  • He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Declaration of Independence, text of the declaration of independence

 

Psychic Friends

On 06/07/2011, in Law, Media, peeves, by Vox

By now I assume that if you heard the story of mass graves in Hardin, TX, you have also heard the search yielded nothing.

First off – the tip came from a psychic. Yes, a psychic called the police and they went to investigate based only on that evidence. Oh yeah, and they first went to another property where they found nothing – and the psychic called back to tell them they went to the wrong place. So they went back out – based on a tip from a psychic.

Let that sink in.

When law enforcement arrived at the second home, they found what they thought might be blood on the back door and residents who were “uncooperative”. You know what? The cops show up at your door and want to do a search because they got a tip from a psychic, I would imagine you would be less than hospitable, too.

The blood was easily explained by an earlier incident that the local police were aware of – a suicide attempt by an AWOL soldier, who was then placed into a military psychiatric hospital in Killeen. The sheriff’s department had a report on file.

Somehow they convinced a judge to issue a search warrant based on that ridiculously flimsy evidence – psychic tip, dried blood.

During the entire ordeal, major news outlets were reporting that a mass grave had already been uncovered. A mass grave with 25-30 dismembered bodies, many of them children. Not blogs, not Twitter – MAJOR news outlets that pride themselves on their credibility. (As @ExJon said: Prediction: Within 10 minutes, reporters who fell for a psychic’s claim about a mass grave will start calling Palin stupid again.)

Comments on the story on most news sites I visited, as well as the one radio host I heard mention it, overwhelmingly blamed the death toll on our unsecured border with Mexico, on Mexicans, on D.C.’s unwillingness to stop the flood of illegal immigration.

First – just stupid on it’s face. Yes, the drug war and illegal immigration have both resulted in some tragic violence, but not every gory crime scene in a southern state is connected to crimes in Mexico.

Second – the location of the supposed carnage is a city to the north & east of Houston. A very long way from any Mexican border town. C’mon people – get some perspective.

(Sorry, rambling, stream of consciousness while watching TV)

UPDATE: From The Houston Chronicle Wait, what? Texas sheriffs now acting on tips from psychics?

 

Sew >> Reap

On 06/06/2011, in Law, peeves, politics, by Vox

Another quick comment on #WeinerGate:

In his “apology”/admission, Rep Weiner says the intended recipient wasn’t to blame/had been unwittingly brought into this/didn’t deserve the negative attention (something along those lines, not in the mood to track down the quote)

So, either she was flirting and/or sexting with a man she knew to be both married and in the public eye, and therefore does deserve a portion of the blame…

Or, Rep Weiner just decided, out of the blue, to send a picture of his junk to some random chick he was following on Twitter, in which case – Eeeeewwww! And CREEPY. And potentially illegal?

Either way, countdown to her appearance in Playboy: 15, 14, 13….

 

Might as well throw out my conspiracy theory for #Weinergate:

Anthony Weiner strikes me as a man who will one day be announcing (while choking back tears, naturally) that he is a gay man. Oh, how his life has been soooo tough because he was buried beneath the overwhelming conflict. Oh, how hard it is to face his constituents and admit the deception. Blah blah blah (Let’s face it, he tries way too hard to convince the world of how very heterosexual he is)

He has insisted that HE did not send the tweet in question. He will not say whether the junk in question is his.

Perhaps the junk is NOT his, but was sent to him by a special friend. Perhaps his wife discovered the pic on Weiner’s computer or cellphone, and, shocked & angered, she decided to send it out to the world.

Perhaps that is why he has not brought in the authorities, why he hasn’t said whose privates those are that have become public.

Or, ya’ know, it’s him and he is just ridiculously pathetic at dealing with an image damaging stumble.

 

Clash of Critters

On 05/28/2011, in animals, general, by Vox

There are areas of the house where the dogs are not allowed to go for various reasons. Mostly so the cats have a safe haven where they won’t be sniffed and poked all the time but also just to keep them away from stuff. Since we established those boundaries early, they are very good about not crossing into forbidden territory. (Cash does try to push it a bit now and then, sticking his paws or nose just over the line LOL)

I’m glad we did it that way – though every now and then I feel bad when, for instance, one of the cats will come in my office and one of the dogs will stand in the doorway looking at me, then looking at the cat, then looking at me…. It almost seems like they are saying, “Hey, Mom, that’s not fair. How come he gets to go in there with you? Huh?”